Consensus 911

Evidence-Based Research for 9/11 Accountability

Consensus 911 employs a rigorous scientific framework—modeled after medical consensus processes—to analyze evidence contradicting the official 9/11 narrative. The organization's 23-member panel of independent experts uses the Delphi Method, a peer-blind review system ensuring 90%+ expert agreement on each Consensus Point, prioritizing direct evidence like witness testimonies and physical data over circumstantial claims.

History & Key Achievements

• Official investigations challenged: Excluded critical evidence from 9/11 Commission and NIST reports including Building 7's collapse and suppressed firefighter accounts.

• Scientific consensus building: Published 57 peer-reviewed Consensus Points documenting:

  • Active thermitic material in WTC dust samples contradicting official explanations

  • Free-fall acceleration of towers matching controlled demolition patterns

• Academic influence: Research featured in American Behavioral Scientist and The Environmentalist journals, establishing peer-reviewed alternatives to government narratives.

Relevance Today (2025)

Senator Ron Johnson's 2025 call for hearings on Building 7's controlled demolition directly validates Consensus 911's decades-long evidence collection.

With 160+ million Americans questioning official accounts, their peer-reviewed repository provides critical infrastructure for legislative and media investigations.

Unique Value

Unlike advocacy groups, Consensus 911 delivers court-admissible evidence through:

• Verifiable data repository: 10,000+ documents including NIST-contested videos and FDNY oral histories

• Academic credibility: Work cited in Journal of 9/11 Studies and Elsevier-published anthologies

How You Can Help

Access their complete research repository:

🔗consensus911.org

9/11 Truth Organizations